5/13/2008 - Regular Board MeetingTHAMES VALLEY DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
REGULAR BOARD MEETING,PUBLIC SESSION
2008 MAY 13,7:00 P.M.
BOARD ROOM,EDUCATION CENTRE
AGENDA
V-verbal
M -material
1.CALL TO ORDER V
2. O CANADA V
3.SPECIAL MUSICAL PRESENTATION -Wilton Grove Public School Band,London V
4.APPROVAL OF AGENDA M
5.OFFICIAL RECORD M
6.RECOGNITIONS -none
7.CONFLICTS OF INTEREST V
8.CHAIR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS V
9.DIRECTOR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS V
10.PRESENTATIONS
a.Public Input re London 1,Oxford 2 and Elgin 1 Accommodation Review
Committees M
11.MINUTES OF THE 2008 APRIL 22 REGULAR BOARD MEETING
a.Confirmation of Minutes M
b.Business Arising from the Minutes
12.STUDENT TRUSTEES'UPDATE V
13.GLENDALE HIGH SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DEFERRED MOTION M
14.REPORTS FROM THE ADMINISTRATION
a.Administrative Response to the Middlesex 1 Accommodation Review
Committee (ARC)Report (Caradoc Central,Caradoc North,Caradoc South,M
Ekcoe Central,Metcalfe Central Public Schools)
b.Report of Middlesex 1 ARC Minority Recommendation -M.Bedford M
c.Minority Report Middlesex 1 ARC - C.McFadden,S.Paisley M
d.Additional Information Requested -Senior Administrative Response to the
Oxford 2 ARC Drumbo Central and Princeton Central Public Schools M
e.Automated External Defibrillators M
15.REPORTS OF COMMITTEES
a.Environmental Advisory Committee Annual Report M
b.Policy Working Committee,2008 April 22 M
c.Trustee Professional Development Committee,2008 April 22 M
d.Budget Advisory Committee,2008 April 28 M
e.Chairs'Committee,2008 May 07 M
f.Special Education Advisory Committee,2008 Aprii 01 iVI
g.Committee of the Whoie,in Camera,2008 IVlay 13 V
16.COMMUNiCATiONS
a.Ontario Pubiic School Boards'Association -Update V
b.Alliance of Canadian Cinema,Television and Radio Artists (ACTRA)M
c.Township of South-West Oxford Draft Resolution M
17.NOTICE OF MOTION
18.MOTION -NOTICE OF WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN -none
19.ADDITIONAL ITEMS
20.QUESTIONS/COMMENTS BY MEMBERS
21.ADJOURNMENT
^"1
THAMES VALLEY DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
REGULAR MEETING,PUBLIC SESSION
2008 MAY 13
The Board met in regular session on 2008 May 13 In the Board Room at the Education Centre,meeting in
public session at 7:05 p.m.to 11:38 p.m.The following were in attendance:
TRUSTEES
J.Bennett
S.Doub
F.Exiey
T.Grant
G.Hart
ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS
B.Tucker
K.Dalton
L.Elliott
B.Greene
M.Sereda
Regrets:K.Patterson
M.Hendrick
P.Jaffe
8.Peters
S.Polhill
T.Roberts
C.Bourbonnais-
MacDonald
L.Griffith-Jones
S.Hughes
M.Moynihan
V.Nielsen
M.E.Smith
B.Sonier
P.Tufts
J.Rowe
P.Sattier (Chair)
J.Stewart
R.Tisdale
B.Wagner
K.Wilkinson
K.Bushell
S.Christie
C.Dennett
K.Meeson ,
W.Scott
1.CALL TO ORDER.
Board Chairperson Sattier called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
2./3.O CANADA AND MUSICAL PRESENTATION
The appreciation ofthe Boardwas extended tothe Wilton GrovePublicSchool Choir,conductor Misty
Niles and accompanists Sharon McHale and Elaine Froese forleading Inthe singing of O'Canada and
performing two musical selections.
4.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved on motion of T.Roberts and F.ExIey.
5.OFFICIAL RECORD
S.Christie,Supervisor -Corporate Services,read the following official record into the minutes:
We regret to record the death of Spencer Knight,a 17-year-old student at H. B.Beal
Secondary School,London,on 2008 April 26.
6.RECOGNITIONS -none
7.CONFLICTS OF INTEREST -No conflicts of Interest were declared.
8.CHAIR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Chair Sattier announced that Jacob Rowe,West Elgin S.S.and Laura Varghese,Saunders S.S.have
been elected as the Student Trustees to serve on the Board for 2008-09.Student Trustee Jacob
Rowe was congratulated on winning his second term of office.
Chair Sattier advised that the Thames Valley Education Foundation is InvolvedInorganizing the John
Greenslade Memorial golf tournament and extended an Invitation to trustees to participate inthe
event.
9.DIRECTOR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Director Tucker requested that Supt.S.Hughes comment regarding a community event which
recognized TVDSB staff.Supt.Hughes advised that earlier In May, he attended a special 2008
Champion of Mental Health Breakfast held at the London Convention Centre.
2008 Mav13...2
9.DIRECTOR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS -cont'd
He advised that two TVDSB staff members,Ralph Hackbarth and Jane Lucas,teachers at the
Reconnect Program,were nominated by a student and his parent and recognized by the Mental
Health Association.He noted that Mr.Hackbarth and Ms Lucas are excellent examples of the caring
staff that make a difference in the lives of Thames Valley students.
10.PRESENTATIONS
a.PUBLIC INPUT RE LONDON 1,OXFORD 2 AND ELGIN 1 ACCOMMODATION REVIEW
COMMITTEES (ARC)
The following individuals and organizations presented public input related to London 1, Oxford
2 and Elgin 1 ARCS.As well,written input was received from Kate,Scott and Lucas
Vanderwielen regarding the London 1 ARC.
John MacDonald
Steve Naftal
Northdale Parents London 1
Mary MacDonald
Ron Plaskett
Northdale Parents supporting the
Minority Report
London 1
Colleen Dawson Individual London 1
Dale Dawson Individual London 1
Alan Roach and
Elizabeth Roach
Northdale Community 'London 1
Laurie Cassell Individual (written submission)London 1
Janice Hewitt '
Erin Newburn
Mike Mann
Stoney Creek Holding Zone
Parents
London 1
Karen Hatherall
Joan Shipley
Individuals London 1
Georgina Spanogiannis Individual London 1
Angela Van Lanen
Philip Haycock
Individuals London 1
Denette Anderson
Jennifer Prince
Team Hiboux, Huron Heights
French Immersion PS.
London 1
Wendy Kipp Princeton Community Oxford 1
John Janson Individual (written submission)Oxford 2
Brent Clutterbuck Individual Elgin 1
Mayor Sylvia Hufhuis
Councillor David Marr
The Corporation of the
Municipalityof Central Elgin
Elgin 1
Darren Goble Southwold PS Parent Council Elgin 1
Laura Penner Sparta School Council and Parent
Teacher Association
Elgin 1
2008 Mav13...3
10.PRESENTATIONS -cont'd
a.Public Input re London 1,Oxford 2 and Elgin 1 ARCs -cont'd
Chair Sattler advised that the dates for Board consideration of the ARC recommendations and
public input are as follows:
London 1 ARC -2008 June 24
Oxford 2 ARC -2008 May 27
Elgin 1 ARC-2008 June 10
Elgin 2 ARC-2008 June 10
She extended appreciation on behalf of the Board to all the presenters and advised that trustees
continue to welcome additional input from the community.They may be contacted via email,
telephone or in writing.
Following the presentations,the meeting recessed at 9:25 p.m and reconvened at 9:38 p.m.
11.MINUTES OF THE 2008 APRIL 22 REGULAR BOARD MEETING
a.CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
The minutes of the Regular,Board Meeting of 2008 April 22 were adopted on motion of J.
Stewart,seconded by P.Jaffe.Trustee Roberts was absent for the vote.
b.BUSINESS ARISING FROM MINUTES
Trustee G. Hart referred to the Annandale School Pilot Proposal (item 15.c.)indicating his
support in pursuing the project perhaps in the fall of 2009.He that Chair Sattler write a letter to
the Ministry of Education indicating TVDSB interest in the Integrated Art and Technology
speciality programs and supporting a pilot project at Annandale School.Director Tucker advised
that the Administration will look at the initiative once Ministry details are released.Chair Sattler
indicated that the Annandale School Council will be sending a letter to Director Tucker regarding
this initiative.The Director will then follow up regarding Thames Valley's interested in a pilot
project
Trustee T.Grant asked how sites are selected for pilot projects.Director Tucker explained that
there are specific criteria attached to initiatives/pilot project and that schools are matched based
on the Ministry requirements.'
12.STUDENT TRUSTEES'UPDATE
Student Trustee Rowe advised that he and Student Trustee Patterson enjoyed taking part in a very
successful Student Trustee Election Day. He extended thanks to the trustees who participated in the
event as well as the Trustees'Assistant,Mrs.S.Pullam.Student Trustee Rowe extended
appreciation to Exec. Supt. L.Elliott forthe opportunity, along with another student,to attend and gain
new perspectives at a recent Technology in Education session.
Student Trustee Rowe advised that the next Student Advisory Council meeting is to be held on 2008
June 3 from 4:00 -6:00 p.m.at the Education Centre and invited trustees to attend.
13.GLENDALE HIGH SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DEFERRED MOTION
The following motion was deferred from the Board meeting of 2008 April 08.
"That the Board approve the proposed renovations and program enhancements to Glendale High
School to accommodate the Grade 9's from Annandale contingent upon approval of funding from
the Ministry ofEducation forthe currently estimated $6.6M necessary forcapital renovations.This
project is in the context of the overall Capital Plan and contingent upon provincial funding."
Trustee Hart requested that the motion be withdrawn.
2008 IVlav13...4
13.GLENDALE HIGH SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DEFERRED MOTION -cont'd
The following motion was moved by J.Stewart,seconded by G. Hart:
That the Board direct the beginning of the design of renovations to Glendaie High School
notwithstanding the disbanding of the Oxford 4 ARC at the 2008 June 10 Board meeting.
The Administration responded to questions posed by Trustees.K.Bushell,Manager,Projects and
Maintenance,clarified the process for approval of the design phase of the Glendaie High School
project emphasizing that time is of the essence if the school is to be ready for a 2009 September
opening.During the discussion,concerns were expressed over approving the design phase outside
of the Oxford 4 Accommodation Review Committee (ARC)process.It was suggested that the
Board's solicitor be consulted to ensure that there are no legal implications attached to the
recommendation.Trustee J.Stewart requested that Solicitor D.Williams be asked to attend the
Board meeting to provide clarification in this regard..
The following motion was moved by R.Tisdale,seconded by J.Bennett:
That the issue of establishing a design committee regarding renovations to Glendaie High School
be deferred until legal advice has been sought from the Board's solicitor.
Following discussion,the mover and seconder agreed to amend the motion adding the phrase "for
discussion at the 2008 May 27 Board meeting,if possible."The motion as amended was approved.
That the issue of establishing a design committee regarding renovations to Glendaie High School
be deferred until legal advice has been sought from the Board's solicitor for discussion at the
2008 May 27 Board meeting,if possible.
14.REPORT FROM THE ADMINISTRATION
a.ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSE TO THE MIDDLESEX 1 ACCOMMODATION REVIEW
COMMITTEE (ARC)REPORT (CARADOC CENTRAL,CARADOC NORTH,CARADOC
SOUTH,EKCOE CENTRAL, METCALFE CENTRAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS)
Exec.Supt.K. Dalton introduced the administrative response to the Middlesex 1 ARC noting it
has completed its task to review accommodation issues affecting Caradoc Central,Caradoc
North,Caradoc South,Ekcoe Central,and Metcalfe Central Public Schools as recommended and
approved by the Board at its 2007 April 10 meeting.The ARC completed its process with a final
public input meeting on 2008 April 28 after which the final ARC Report was forwarded to the
Senior Administration for response.
Trustee Doub,in her capacity as Chair of the Middlesex 1 Accommodation Review Committee,
presented a summary of its Final Report.She extended appreciation to each of the committee
members for volunteering their time and efforts as well as individuals who provided thoughtful
Input.She noted that the final report is quite extensive and highlighted key points.
The Middlesex 1 ARC included Caradoc Central,Caradoc North,Caradoc South,Ekcoe Central
and Metcalfe Central Public Schools.The 15 members represented five school communities met
seven times and drafted 13 recommendations.Each recommendation has an extensive
rationale.Trustee Doub spoke to the first recommendation (as follows) noting that it best
captures the essence of what the Committee is requesting trustees to consider.
That the five schools,namely Caradoc Central Public School,Caradoc North Public School,
Caradoc South Public School,Ekcoe Central Public School and Metcalfe Central Public
School,remain open,viable,and the hubs of each of their respective communities.
2008 May 13...5
r
r"
14.REPORT FROM THE ADMINISTRATION cont'd
a.ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSE TO THE MIDDLESEX 1 ACCOMMODATION REVIEW
COMMITTEE (ARC)REPORT (CARADOC CENTRAL, CARADOC NORTH, CARADOC
SOUTH,EKCOE CENTRAL, METCALFE CENTRAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS)-cont'd
The complete rationale for this recornmendation states that the Committee and the communities
represented felt strongly that the economic welfare of their communities are dependant upon
neighbourhood schools.The Committee expressed concern over moving students from five to
three schools and the resulting impact on student access to libraries,gymnasiums and
greenspace as well as consolidation threatening the viabilityof Glencoe District High School.
Recommendations 2 and 4 outline the Committee's desire to demolish all but the existing general
purpose room and existing kindergarten room currently housed at Caradoc South.There is
currently $3.2M of previously approved Prohibitiveto Repair (PTR) funding available that could
be used toward this construction project creating a more energy efficient building thus allowing
the school to remain a viable part of the Melbourne community.
There are potential partnerships that the ARC is requesting the Board to explore.First, a
partnership between TVDSB and the Municipalities of Southwest Middlesex and Strathroy
Caradoc.The Melbourne community has entered into discussions with these municipalities who
have agreed to purchase fully serviced land for the TVDSB should a new school be built.The
Melbourne community is also encouraging the Board to seek partnership with Munsee-Delaware
First Nations to relocate their children from Westminster Central Public School to Caradoc South
Public School.With tuition agreements,set to expire at the end of 2008,are viewed by the ARC
as a perfect opportunity for a partnership to be established.
The ARC is also encouraging the Board to seek partnerships with the Middlesex County library,
that has supported the idea of relocating the existing library into Caradoc South.Finally,the
Caradoc South community is encouraging the Board to seek a partnership with the Melbourne
Agricultural Society who has agreed to sell or lease land to the Board should additional land for
the reconstruction of the Caradoc South building be required.
A report has also been compiled and submitted by the Metcalfe community outlining support for
the ARC'S recommendation 1 and more specifically to keep Metcalfe Central Public School open
and viable.Trustee Doub encouraged the trustees to analyze the document (Appendix 3) prior
to deliberations in 2008 September.
Trustee Doub commented on the two Middlesex 1 ARC Minority Reports.Both Minority Reports
have requested that committees be established to explore Issues of transportation and the
student and staff transition process.
It was noted that the public Input heard throughout the deliberations strongly supported that all
five schools remain open and viable In their respective communities.Concerns were expressed
that Senior Administrative recommendations,if supported,would result In the lose of close-knit
relationships among students and staff,less extra-curricular opportunities,increased bus rides
'as well as various safety and well being issues.
Trustee Doub summarized by thanking the Committee members and community members for
their work over the past months.
Administrative Response
Exec.Supt.K.Dalton presented the Administrative response to the final report of the Middlesex
1 Accommodation Review Committee.The Senior Administration's response and rationale to
the recommendations were outlined as follows.
2008 Mav13...6
14.REPORT FROM THE ADMINISTRATION -cont'd
a.ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSE TO THE MIDDLESEX 1 ACCOMMODATION REVIEW
COMMITTEE (ARC)REPORT (CARADOC CENTRAL,CARADOC NORTH,CARADOC
SOUTH,EKCOE CENTRAL,METCALFE CENTRAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS)-cont'd
Senior Administrative Recommendation Rationale
Ttie Middlesex 1 Accommodation Review Committee's recommendations cannot be supported
by Senior Administration as the recommendations focus on maintaining allfive schools that were
studied.The Senior Administration is recommending that the student population (1049.5 FTE
as per the 2006-07 school year)in this area be accommodated in three schools.The
consolidation of students into three (3)schools will allow:
a.Program enhancements to the facility at the Caradoc Central site that would meet the
Thames Valley District School Board's standards,and would better serve the students of
Caradoc Central and Caradoc South Public Schools.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Senior Administrative Recommendation Rationale -cont'd
Renewal projects at Caradoc Central Public School to be completed in conjunction with
construction of the addition and program enhancements.
Program benefits for students at Caradoc South Public School (84.5 FTE*)and Caradoc
Central Public School (294.5 FTE*)would be possible with the increased number of students
and resulting staff allocated to the school.Schools which have experienced growth in
student populations and the subsequent additional staffing allocations have realized program
benefits which include but are not limited to;
Increased potential for special education resources resulting in more flexibility to meet
student needs;
Increased budget for centralized resources eg. Library,athletics,literacy;
Increased opportunities for teacher specialization;
Increased adults available for co-curricular activities;
Increased number and flexibility of adults for supervision of students;
Increased Learning Support Teacher and Teacher Librarian time;
Increased on-site staff collaboration for curricular responsibilities;
Increased opportunities for teacher sharing on-site,within divisions to meet student
needs;
Increased flexibility for class organizations to benefit students.
*projected enrolments for 2010 September
Permanent accommodation for the students of Caradoc Central and Caradoc South Public
Schools on the Caradoc Central site (there are currently 4 portables at Caradoc Central and
2 portables at Caradoc South).
Program benefits for the students of Metcalfe Central (109 FTE*)and Caradoc North (141
FTE*)Public Schools that would be possible with the increased number of students and
resulting staff allocated to the school.
*projected enrolments for 2010 September
f. Fiscal responsibility with the elimination of the ongoing operating costs of Caradoc South and
Metcalfe Central Public Schools.
g. More effective use of staff previously allocated at the two small schools to meet system
needs.
2008 Mav13...7
14.REPORT FROM THE ADMINISTRATION -cont'd
a.ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSE TO THE MIDDLESEX 1 ACCOMMODATION REVIEW
COMMITTEE(ARC) REPORT (CARADOCCENTRAL,CARADOCNORTH,CARADOCSOUTH,
EKCOE CENTRAL,METCALFE CENTRAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS)-cont'd
Senior Administrative Response -cont'd
It would be beneficial for Senior Administration to work with the Caradoc South and Metcalfe
Central School Councils to receive input regarding the determination of the boundaries that would
designate students from Caradoc South and Metcalfe Central Public Schools.
Exec.Supt.Dalton explained that Recommendation 6 discharges the ARC as per the Thames
Valley DistrictSchool Board's procedure on "Pupil Accommodation and Facility Organization."
Appreciation is extended to the ARC members and the personnel of the Thames Valley District
School Board who provided an invaluable resource to the Committee.The work completed,the
time spent,and the careful deliberations of the members contributes to the process of providing
the maximum program opportunities for the maximum number of students.
Senior Administrative Response to Middlesex 1 ARC Recommendations
The Middlesex 1 ARC established specific recommiendations for Trustee consideration.The
recommendations and rationale found In the Final ARC Report included Appendices that
expanded on the recommendations and-provide detailed rationale from the writers of the
recommendations.As stated previously, the Senior Administration cannot support the ARC's
recommendation to keep all five schools in the area open.Below are specific responses to the
individual recommendations from the ARC.
a.Keep All Schools Open
While the Senior Administration appreciates the perspective taken in the Middlesex 1 ARC
recommendations,it remains the Senior Administration's"responsibility to make
recommendations which maximize program opportunities for the maximum number of
students.Keeping allfive schools open does not achieve this goal as the Board's resources
continue to be spread thin. As stated previously,consolidating students in three facilities
allows for program enhancements,accommodation of more students in permanent facilities,
program benefits that accompany Increased number of staff,and decreased operational
costs.
b.Demolish A Portion of Caradoc South and Rebuild Caradoc South on the Caradoc South Site
The estimated costs of maintaining the existing gymnasium and kindergarten facility (the
newer portion of the facility),demolishing the remaining facility and rebuilding Caradoc South
Public School to Thames Valley District School Board standards is estimated at $3,581,000.
This costing Is based on the accommodation of 109 FTE or 118 students (2006-07 enrolment
numbers that have been utilized throughout the ARC's deliberations).
c.Caradoc South Students Be Placed in Portables During Construction
While the Middlesex 1 ARC inits recommendation suggests that the existing gymnasium and
kindergarten class would be available for use during construction,in fact these facilities would
not be available.Thus this would increase the difficulty to program effectively for students
restricted solely to portable facilities.Lease arrangements could be made with the
Municipalityfor the use oftheir office and washroom facilities during the year of construction.
^d.Use Remainino Prohibitive to Repair Funds to Construct a New Gvmnasium and General
Arts Room at Caradoc Central
The cost of a new gymnasium and general arts room on the Caradoc Central site is
estimated at $1,413,000.With the cost of construction on the Caradoc South site
($3,581,000 outlined above),there would not be sufficient funds remaining from the $3.2
million in Prohibitive to Repair funding to provide these facility enhancements for program.
2008 Mav13...8
14.REPORT FROM THE ADMINISTRATION -cont'd
a.ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSE TO tHE MIDDLESEX 1 ACCOMMODATION REVIEW
COMMITTEE (ARC) REPORT (CARADOCCENTRAL,CARADOC NORTH, CARADOCSOUTH,
EKCOE CENTRAL, METCALFE CENTRAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS)-cont'd
Senior Administrative Response -cont'd
e.Relocate Munsee-Delaware First Nations Students to Caradoc South
.This is a matter for negotiations with the First Nations bands.
The addition of Munsee-Delaware First Nations students would increase enrolment by
approximately 20 students resulting in an increased cost of $210,000 to the capital costs
identified by the Senior Administration above ($3,581,000).This added cost reflects the
addition of one classroom.
f.Boundarv Adiustments to Ekcoe Central and Caradoc Central
Adjusting the boundaries of Ekcoe Central and Caradoc Central Public Schools to increase
the student population of Caradoc South to approximately 150 -200 students would still leave
Caradoc South Public School with the ongoing challenges of a small school.Inaddition, the
students that would be transferred from Ekcoe Central and Caradoc Central Public Schools
would not be advantaged with these boundary changes.This would not be maximizing
program opportunities for the maximum number of students.
g.Partnership with Middlesex Countv Public Librarv
Similar to the partnership developed at Plattsville Public School,discussions could occur with
the MiddlesexCounty Public Library for a shared facility and shared operating and capital
construction costs.
h.Acquire Additional Land If Necessary
The acquisition of additional land to reach the desired size for an elementary site of 5 - 8
acres (current size is 2.59 acres)would involve additional costs inacquisition and ongoing
operating expenses for the benefit of a small number of students.
i.Review Boundaries and Move Students from Strathrov to Metcalfe and Build onto Metcalfe
Adjusting the boundaries of Strathroy to increase the student population of Metcalfe Central
Public School would result incapital costs to build classrooms,no program enhancements
for students,and leave Metcalfe Central withthe continual challenges of a small school.
Increasing the population would increase the stress on the existing sanitary and water
services that present challenges currently. The ongoing operating costs ofthe facility would
be not be eliminated.
j.Transfer Some of the French Immersion Students from Colborne to Caradoc North
Historically,French Immersion inMiddlesex County did see a split inthe student population
with a portion of the French Immersion program at Caradoc North.Dyer time,the former
Middlesex County Board of Education consolidated the French Immersion students and staff
at Colborne Street Public School to maximize French Immersion program benefits.This
recommendation wouldrelieve the current enrolment pressure at Colborne Street but would
not move the program any closer to a single track French Immersion program. The
accommodation of Middlesex County French Immersion students requires a total review as
has been recommended by Senior Administration inthe response to the London 1ARC.In
addition, this French Immersion study needs to be coordinated with an Accommodation
Review for the Town of Strathroy.
2008 Mav13...9
14.REPORT FROM THE ADMINISTRATION -cont'd
a.ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSE TO THE MIDDLESEX 1 ACCOMMODATION REVIEW
COMMITTEE (ARC) REPORT (CARADOCCENTRAL, CARADOCNORTH,CARADOC SOUTH,
EKCOE CENTRAL,METCALFE CENTRAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS)-cont'd
Senior Administrative Response -cont'd
!<.Scheduling a Principal or Custodian for an Afternoon or Evening Shift Durino the Weel<
Scheduling a custodian in the afternoon or evening is possible but would leave the school
withouttrained personnel to operate the buildingduring the instructional day when students
are in attendance.The custodian is the first line of response to handle building issues and
emergencies." •
Principals'working hours are not on specified shifts. Principals currently devote many hours
outside of the instructional day to support their school community.
Cost/Sayings - To be determine upon design completion.
Funding inthe amount of$3.2 million Isavailable tothe Thames ValleyDistrictSchool Board
through previously approved Ministry Prohibitive to Repair Allocation.
The timelines presented indicated a 2010 September date for completion of addition on
Caradoc Central P.S.and closure of Caradoc South P.S.and Metcaife Central P.S.It was
noted that all timelines are subject to the Ministryof Education's approval process.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1.That the students of Caradoc South Public School be accommodated at Caradoc Central and
Ekcoe Central Public Schools:and
That an addition be constructed and renovations be completed at Caradoc Central Public
School to enhance program and meet enrolment needs;and
That the present Caradoc South Public School at 611 Peter St., Melbourne, be closed and
declared surplus.
2.That Senior Administration consult with the Caradoc South School Council In order to
facilitate input on boundaries for school designation.
3.That the students of Metcaife Central Public School be accommodated at Caradoc North and
Ekcoe Central Public Schools;and
That the present Metcaife Central Public School at 6100 Calvert Dr.R.R.#3 Strathroy,be
closed and declared surplus.
4.That Senior Administration consult with the Metcaife Central School Council in order to
facilitate input on the boundaries for school designation.
5.That a Design Committee be appointed to provide input to the addition and renovations at
Caradoc Central Public School.
6.That the Middlesex 1 Accommodation Review Committee be disbanded.
The Administration responded to trustees'questions.Manager Bushell provided clarificationon
the criteria for calculating the Prohibitiveto Repair funding for the proposed addition/renovation
at Caradoc Central P.S.
2008 IVIav13...10
14.REPORT FROM THE ADMINISTRATION -cont'd
a.ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSE TO THE MIDDLESEX 1 ACCOMMODATION REVIEW
COMMITTEE (ARC)REPORT (CARADOC CENTRAL,CARADOC NORTH,CARADOC SOUTH,
EKCOE CENTRAL,METCALFE CENTRAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS)-cont'd
Senior Administrative Response -cont'd
A motion to sit past 11:00 p.m. to 11:45 p.m.was moved by J.Bennett,seconded by R.Tisdale and
carried.
The following motion was moved by T.Roberts,seconded by S. Doub and carried:
That Recommendations 1,2,3,4,and 5 of the Senior Administrative response to the IVliddlesex
1 ARC be deferred to the 2008 September 23 Board meeting for consideration.
Recommendation 6 was adopted on motion of S.Doub,seconded by F.Exiey.
b.REPORT OF MIDDLESEX 1 ARC MINORITY RECOMMENDATION
A IVlinority Report was submitted by l^avis Bedford,Ekcoe Central Public School Community
Representative.It indicated that it does not support all the recommendations contained in the
Middlesex 1 Accommodation Review Committee Final Report.It supports the original TVDSB
recommehdation to close Caradoc South and Metcalfe Public Schools and relocate the students
to Caradoc Central,Cafadoc North and Ekcoe Central Public Schools.The Minority Report
emphasizes the program benefits for students in elementary schools of at least 400 students.
c.MINORITY REPORT MIDDLESEX 1 ARC
A Minority Report was submitted by Cheryl McFadden,Community Representative and Sandra
Paisley,School Council Representative,Caradoc Central P.S.expressing concern that the
Middlesex 1 ARC recommendation fails to address the funding issues presented and does not
provide realistic and reasonable options forthe childrenand communities involved. The Minority
Report supports the Board's proposal to close Caradoc South and Metcalfe Central P.S.and
consolidate their catchment areas into Caradoc Central,Caradoc North and Ekcoe Central Public
Schools.This process would allow for a major enhancement project and addition to Caradoc
Central using Prohibitive to Repair funding from the Ministryof Education.
d.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED -SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSE TO
THE OXFORD 2 ARC DRUMBO CENTRAL AND PRINCETON CENTRAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS
K.Bushell,Manager,FacilityServices,presented additionalinformation requested bythe trustees
at the 2008 March 25 Board Meeting pertaining to the Senior Administration response to the
Oxford 2 ARC. Inparticular,alternate site implications, costing for a septic system inPrinceton
for a proposed new school and the possible development ofa "Green School"were requested.
Alternate Site(s)
The trustees requested information on disposal of the existing school sites in Princeton and
Drumbo.In discussion with the Board's solicitor, David Williams, itis his opinion that the Board
must follow Regulation 444-98 entitled "Disposition of Surplus Real Property'.This Regulation
requires the Boardto follow certain procedures when disposing ofsurplus propertyafter having
the property appraised priorto offeringitto preferred parties listed inthe regulation (coterminous
boards,ministries and municipalities). Ifthere is no interest from the preferred parties,then the
Board can offer itfor sale to the public. Anynew sites to be acquired by the Board would follow
the acquisition process used in the past.
Costing of a Seotic System in Princeton
The second request for information from the meeting centered around the cost to develop
sanitary sewage facilities on a site in Princeton, since this Village does not have municipal
services.Upon reviewing Ministryof Environment criteria,the capacity of the proposed school
would generate a design flowof 12,750 litres per day. Using this volume to design the system
is estimated to cost $416,000 including fees.
2008 I\/Iav13...11
14.REPORT FROM THE ADMINISTRATION -cont'd
d.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED -SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSE TO
THEOXFORD2ARC DRUMBO CENTRAL AND PRINCETON CENTRAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS-
cont'd
Green Schools
The possibility of the TVDSB constructing a "Green School" was questioned.The following
details information on building a Green School and the associated costs:
With the ever growing concern of how our environment is deteriorating,it Is important that
the education sector participates in designing,constructing and operating energy efficientand
environmentally friendly schools.
The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)Certification is the current
program in place to ensure that a building meets anticipated standards for energy efficiency,
uses environmentally friendly building products and has a minimum operational impact on
the environment.
Todesign and construct a LEED Certified building is estimated tocost between $180 to$200
per FP (current Ministry benchmark funding is $156.24 per FT^).This equates
approximately to an increase of $835,000 to $1,670,000 for a typical elementary school of
400 students.
There is an additional cost of $20,000 to have a school LEED Certified at the completion of
the project.
• In discussions with our Consultants (architectural,mechanical and electrical)the present
designs of our new schools and additions are in keeping with the energy efficiencies that
would be required in a LEED certified school at a minimum.
At the present time there are only twenty five (25) LEED registered elementary schools and
fifteen (15)LEED registered secondary schools in Canada according to the Canada Green
Building Council website (CAGBC),with the majority of these projects in western Canada.
Currently the Ministryof Education does not provide additional Capital funding intheir Pupil
Accommodation Grants to fund energy or environmentally friendly initiative for new school
design.
• With the Ministry being the Boards only source of revenue to design and construct new
schools,and with the pressure of constructing these schools at the current Ministry
benchmark cost,itIs impossible to take any significant initiative towards LEED Certification
under the current funding model.
The Administration responded to trustees'questions.Chair Sattler commented that the Ontario
Public School Boards'Association (OPSBA)Executive has endorsed the concept of "Green
Schools".A motion is to be presented at the OPSBA's 2008 Annual General Meeting and
Program (AGM)requesting that the Ministry consider moving in that direction. Chair Sattler
advised that information will be presented to trustees as It becomes available.
Because of the lateness of the hour,the following motion was moved by P.Jaffe,seconded by S.
Polhill and carried:
That agenda items 14.e.,15.d.,and 16.b.be deferred to the 2008 May27 Board meeting for
consideration.
2008 Mav13...12
e.AUTOMATED EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATORS
The Automated External Defibrillators report was deferred to 2008 May 27 Regular Board
Meeting for consideration.
15.REPORTS OF COMMITTEES
a.ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORt
Exec.Supt.L. Elliott introduced the Environmental Advisory Committee Annual Report.She
recognized Janine Pitman,Learning Supervisor,Math,Science &Technology,for her leadership
role in this initiative.•
The report indicated that,per Procedures 5002 -Environmental Education and Management
Program,the Environmental Education and Management Committee is required to make
recommendations to Senior Administration with respect to Environmental Education and
Management programs and practices and to prepare an annual report to the Board.
The Environmental Education and Management Committee has prepared its annual report to the
Board.Within the report,the Committee has identified four future projects for consideration at
an additional cost of $72,425.Each project would require an adequate level of resource
allocation.The suggested projects include the following:
provide programs and training that willbring schools into compliance with the 3R regulations:
continue to work on the implementation of the recommendations from the Shaping Our
Schools,Shaping Our Future report;
continued implementation of EcoSchools;
establishment of an Ecological Literacy Integration Team would allow the Board's goals to
be reached.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Annual Report of the Environmental Advisory Committee of 2008 May 13 be referred
to the Budget Advisory Committee for consideration of the requests for additional funding.
The recommendation was adopted on motion of J.Bennett,seconded by T.Grant.
Chair Sattler extended congratulations on behalf of the Board to the Environmental Advisory
Committee for moving this Initiative forward.
b.REPORT OF THE POLICY WORKING COMMITTEE,2008 April 22
Trustee Bennett spoke to the April 22 PolicyWorking Committee report noting the procedure on
Procedures for Supervision of Teaching Staff had not been attached to the report. As such,the
following motion was moved by J.Bennett,seconded by R.TIsdale and carried:
That the 2008 April 22 report of the PolicyWorking Committee be deferred to the 2008 May
27 Board meeting for consideration and that copies of the Procedures for Supervision of
Teaching Staff be provided to all trustees other than members of the Policy Working
Committee.
2008 IVlav13...13
15.REPORTS OF COMMITTEES -cont'd
c.REPORT OF THE TRUSTEE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
2008 April22
4:00 -4:50 pm
MEMBERS ADMINISTRATION &OTHERS
P.Jaffe S.Pullam
J.Stewart
S.Doub +4:25
1.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved by motion.
2.ELECTION OF CHAIR
Trustee James Stewart was elected Chair for the 2007-08 year.
3. UPDATE ON 2007-2008 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (PD) BUDGET
A report outlining the P.D.expenditures from 2007 September to 2008 April 01 was reviewed.
The report was attached.Each trustee has approximately $1781 allotted for P.D.
opportunities up to April 01.
4.P.D.COMMITMENTS AFTER APRIL 01
Twelve P.D.forms requesting approval of funds from the P.D.monies pooled after April 01
for various P.D.opportunities were received.It was determined that there were adequate
funds remaining to cover the cost of these requests and it was recommended that approval
for release of those funds be given.Any funds remaining in the P.D.line after 2008 August
31 would be brought forward to the next budget year and deposited in the P.D. - New Trustee
line as per Board motion.If all requests are approved,all but one trustee will have made use
of P.D.funds.
The following recommendation was made:
That since there are adequate funds,the requests submitted for funds for Professional
Development opportunities after 2008 April 01 be approved.
5.Other Business -none
6. Next Meeting - to be determined.
7.Adjournment -The meeting was adjourned at 4:50 p.m.
RECOMMENDATION:
That since there are adequate funds,the requests submitted for funds for Professional
Development opportunities after 2008 April 01 be approved.•
J.STEWART,
Chairperson
The recommendation was adopted on motion of J.Stewart,seconded by P.Jaffe.
2008 May 13...14
15.REPORTS OF COMMITTEES -cont'd
d.REPORT OF THE BUDGET ADVISORY COMMITTEE,2008 APRIL 28
The Report of the Budget Advisory Committee of 2008 April 18 was deferred to the Board
meeting of 2008 May 27.
e.REPORT OF THE CHAIRS'COMMITTEE 2008 May 07
9:15 a.m.-11:35 a.m.
MEMBERS ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS
J.Bennett P.Sattler (Chair)B.Tucker S.Christie
G.Hart J.Stewart
1.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved by motion.
2.CONFLICTS OF INTEREST -none declared
3.REVIEW OF 2008 MAY 13 BOARD AGENDA
The agendas for the in-camera and public Board meetings of May 13,2008,were discussed
and updated.
4.CORRESPONDENCE
The following correspondence will be included in the trustees'information packages:
Peel District School Board to Minister of Education regarding School Site Acquisition -/"
referred to the Senior Administration for response;
Corporation of the County of-Elgln regarding a recommendation to establish an ARC to
study Westminster Central PS and South Dorchester PS.
A letter from ACTRA regarding a corporate film funded by TVDSB was added to the May 13,
2008,Board agenda under "Communications".Supt.B.Sonier will be asked to respond to
the request.
5.FUTURE MPP/MP MEETINGS
Dates for meeting with the area MPPs and MPs were discussed.It was agreed to schedule
a tentative meeting for September 12 with the MPPs from 9:00-10:30 a.m.and with the MPs
on September 19 from 9:00-10:30 a.m.Chair Sattler will arrange to have the necessary
contacts made.
6.RESOLUTION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH-WEST OXFORD
A draft resolution from the Township of South-west Oxford to the Minister of Education
related to the use of school facilities in the township was discussed and added to the May 13
Board agenda under "Communications".Director Tucker will contact the Township
requesting its assistance in having a similar resolution considered by area municipalities.
He suggested having a half-day forum organized with the municipalities to discuss expanding
community partnerships and sharing resources and facilities.Chair Sattler will send a letter
of appreciation to the Township of South-West Oxford for their support.
7.REQUEST TO PRESENT TO BOARD
A request to present to the Board seeking the Introduction of a ballroom dancing course was
discussed.It was agreed to schedule the presentation for the June 10 Board meeting.
2008 Mav13...15
15.REPORTS OF COMMITTEES -cont'd
e.REPORT OF THE CHAIRS'COMMITTEE -cont'd
8.OTHER BUSINESS
a.Transportation Consortium
Director Tucker updated the Committee on the Transportation Consortium noting ithas
set up its office on Wellington Road South in Glanworth. A memo to the system and
trustees will be emailed in this regard along with contact information. A report will be
brought to trustees in June.
b.Response to CPAC Recommendations
Director Tucker advised the Committee that responses to the Capital Planning Advisory
Committee recommendations will be coming to the Board on May 27.The role and term
of CPAC was discussed.
c.Student Trustee Attendance at OSTA -deferred to next meeting
d.Response to Tollgate Public School Parent
A letter from a Tollgate Public School parent regarding the French Immersion program
in Oxford County was discussed.Chair Sattler will respond to the letter noting that
Trustee Stewart will be meeting with the Tollgate School Council in this regard.
9..DATE AND TIME OF NEXT MEETING
Future meetings were scheduled for 9:00 a.m.on May 21,June 4 and 18.
10.ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 11:35 a.m.by motion.
RECOMMENDATIONS:none
P.SATTLER.
Chairperson
f.REPORT OF THE SPECIAL EDUCATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2008 April01
11:45 a.m.-2:35 p.m.
Members
R.Tisdale,Trustee
M.Barbeau,VOICE for Hearing-Impaired Children
B.Hoffman,Autism Ontario London
J.Gritzan,Thames Valley Children's Centre
B. Harvey,Epilepsy Support Centre
Elizabeth Karry,Children's Aid Society of London &
Middlesex
A.Loebus,London Down Syndrome Association
B. Montminy,Madame Vanier Children's Services
A.Morse,Easter Seal Society
M.Masters Integration Action for Inclusion London
Chapter
W.Rodic,Madame Vanier Children's Services (alt)
C.Thammavongsa,Assoc.for Bright Children (alt)
2008 Mav13...16
Administration and Others
J.Johnston,Special Education Learning Supervisor
S.Hughes,Superintendent of Education,Special
Education
P.Cook.Elementary Principal
J. Van Bommel,Secondary Vice Principal
Regrets:J.Bennett,Trustee;T.Grant,Trustee;D.Ensing,Association for Bright Children;S.
Wilson,Community Living Education Committee;G.McGahey,Chippewas of the Thames First
Nation Board of Education
Absent:D.Almost,Ontario Assoc.For Families of Children with Communication Disorders
1.CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 12:18 p.m.in the Katherlne Harley Room at the Education
Centre.
2.CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
A.Morse added reports from the following committees to the agenda:Communications
Update,Ad Hoc Committee for Inclusion,Mental Health Committee and Special Education
Plan Review Committee
The motion to approve the agenda as amended was carried.
3.CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
There were no conflicts of interest declared.
4.REPORT OF MEETING FROM MARCH 3,2008
The report of the March 3,2008,meeting was approved.
5.SPECIAL EDUCATION BUDGET INFORMATION I UPDATES 2008-09
B.Greene,Executive Superintendent of Business Services,and K.Meeson,Manager of
Financial Services,attended to provide updates on the Budget process.B.Greene stated
thatthe Ministry of Education announced funding Information for 2008/09 lastweek. A total
of $57.3 M will continue to support special education while work proceeds on new
approaches to funding.
This funding across the province includes:
High Needs Amount (HNA)to keep.In 2008/09 funding stable in declining enrolment
boards,Special Equipment Amount (SEA) to recognize growth In demand for specialized
equipment for students with special needs;
Special Incidence Portion (SIP)to recognize the number of claims made on behalf of
students who require extraordinary staff support;•
Facilities Amount (FA) to address non-salary costs,to establish and maintain the
proposed Roy MCMurtry Centre in Peel Region;and
• To increase the number of programs for children and youth In Government approved
facilities.
In addition,an investment of $10M announced in August Is unallocated at this time. This
funding supports the Government's commitment to increase special education funding by8%
by 2011-12
2008 May 13...17
15.REPORTS OF COMMITTEES -cont'd
f.REPORT OF THE SPECIAL EDUCATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE -cont'd
5.SPECIAL EDUCATION BUDGET INFORMATION I UPDATES 2008-09 -cont'd
With this announcement,the IVlinlstry prepares a Board profile.The Thames Valley profile
shows a decrease of $209,721 from last year (Ministry projections).The high needs amount
remains the same.There is a loss of $776,000 on SEPPA funds due to declining enrolment
in our Board.
Exec.Supt.Greene stated that the Budget Advisory Committee is continuing to work towards
a multi-year budget plan to deal with declining enrolment.A Budget Working Group
(comprised of principals,superintendents,department staff)are reviewing issues to
determine where savings can be found over the next three years.
Budget issue sheets will be completed outlining the impact on schools and the system and
will identify action plans,implementation strategies etc.These forms will be forwarded to the
Budget Advisory Committee and then to the Board.Exec.Supt.Greene advised that there
are approximately 40 Issues to review over the next three years with Special Education being
one of the first on the list.The list of issues will be available to the public when Itis received
by the Board.
A.Loebus asked if there will be cuts in special education.Mr.Greene stated that Special
Education will be reviewed looking at the next three years and it will consider declining
enrolment,how it will impact special education,if the decline will be mirrored in special
education and how it will be achieved.
C.Thammavongsa asked ifwhen reviewing the special education budget,will the committee
take Into account reconciling the budget expenses to ensure that only special education items
are being charged to the special education account lines,e.g.Psychological services,as not
all items are special education charges.Mr.Greene stated that before the Budget goes to
the Board,itwill be brought to SEAC for review.
R.Tisdale stated that it is important that the public not think that special education Is the
cause of the Board's deficit.Mr.Greene stated that the same levels cannot be maintained
each year as long as the Board is in a state of declining enrolment.
W.Rodic raised the concern that special education money is going to ESL students.Mr.
Greene stated that all ESL money is converted into actual ESL teacher positions and that no
LST's are being diverted to ESL.
R.Tisdale asked Ifitwould be possible to investigate using some of the grant money that the
Board receives towards assisting with the decline in the SEPPA funding.
6.VANIER REPRESENTATIVES PRESENTATION ON THE CLOSURE OF THE EARLY
INTERVENTION PROGRAM
J.Jones and L.Ondenko attended to present information about the Early Intervention
Program slated to close this year because of the lack of core funding.The following motion
was moved by A.Loebus ,seconded by C.Thammavongsa and carried:
That the Chair of SEAC write on behalf of SEAC a letter to the Minister for Children &
Youth Services in support of core funding to maintain Early Intervention Services
Program at Madame Vanier.
7.SPECIAL EDUCATION WEBSITE
J.Johnston asked to defer the item on Special Education Website to the next meeting.
2008 May 13...18
15.REPORTS OF COMMITTEES -cont'd
f.REPORT OF THE SPECIAL EDUCATION ADVISORY COM MITTEE -cont'd
5.SPECIAL EDUCATION BUDGET INFORMATION I UPDATES 2008-09 -cont'd
8.COMMITTEE UPDATES
a.Communication Committee
A.Morse reported that the Communication Committee met todevelop a Communication
Protocols guide forthe TVDSB.She stated that the Committee will be using some ofthe
information from the York pamphlet on Communication and will develop other protocols
using material from "Shared Solution".It is expected that the draft guide will be available
for SEAC to review at the May meeting.
b.Ad Hoc Inclusion Committee
Supt.S.Hughes stated that he has reviewed the draft report of the Ad Hoc Inclusion
Committee.The report will be brought to SEAC for members to view.
c.Special Education Review Plan Committee
A.Morse stated that the Special Ed Review Plan Committee met on March 28 and is
completing its review of the sections.It has completed a form that will be sent to
principals for input,as well as available on the website for anyone to complete and
submit inputto the Plan. Publicinput will be received until May 16''^.
A.Morse advised that the Plan Review Committee is investigating the possibility of
having it distributed electronically this year,on a disk to everyone,as well as having It
"live" on the Board's website.This would mean that by clicking on a word or phrase
within the document,a pop up window could appear that would offer the reader more ^
information or a definition of the term.
B.Hoffman stated that the Transportation Committee should meet to review the
Transportation policy re transporting to and from respite.J.Johnston advised that the
Board has partnership agreements with several agencies providing respite.
9.CORRESPONDENCE
Notice has been received from the Learning Disabilities Association of Ontario to replace
Debbie Lee with Stacey Cassell as the current representative on SEAC.
10.FORUM:ASSOCIATION UPDATES
J.Gritzan reported that Thames Valley Children's Centre and Community Living London
have hired parent mentors who are available to parents to assist in developing and
maintaining effective relationships with their children.
B.Harvey reported that the Epilepsy Centre is holding a Gala Event on Saturday,April
3,2008.Tickets can be obtained through the Centre.
W.Rodic reported that Parents For Children's Mental Health is holding a conference on
May 09;tickets are available at http://www.parentsforchlldrensmentalhealth.orQ.
B.Hoffman reminded the group about Dr.Peter Szatmari's speaking engagement on
Wednesday,May 14,at 7:00 p.m.at Centennial Hall in London.
It was agreed that parent mentors will be invited to attend the next meeting.
2008 IVlav13...19
15.REPORTS OF COMMITTEES -cont'd
f.REPORT OF THE SPECIAL EDUCATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE -cont'd
5.SPECIAL EDUCATION BUDGET INFORMATION I UPDATES 2008-09 -cont'd
11.FUTURE MEETINGS
Future meetings are scheduied for:
2008 May5 - 7:00 p.m. London Room, Education Centre
2008 May 20 -7:00 p.m. London Room,Education Centre
2008 June 3 -11:45 a.m. Lunch, 12:15 p.m. Meeting - London Room, Education
Centre
12.ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 2:35 p.m.by motion.
RECOMMENDATIONS:none
B.H0FFIV1AN.
Chair
g.REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE -IN CAMERA 2008 May 13
MEMBERS PRESENT
J.Stewart(Chair)
J.Bennett
8.Doub (6:00)
F.Exiey
T.Grant
G.Hart
P.Jaffe
K.Patterson
S.Peters
8.Poihiii
T.Roberts
J.Rowe
P.Sattier
R.Tisdaie
Absent:M.Hendrick
ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS
B.Tucl<er
B.Greene
K.Daiton
M.Sereda
C.Bourbonnais-
MacDonald
L.Griffith-Jones
S.Hughes
M.Moynihan
V.Nielsen
M.E.Smith
B.Sonier
P.Tufts
B.Wagner
K.Wilkinson
8.Christie
C.Dennett
The Committee met in camera from 5:07 p.m.to 6:25 p.m.
1.-APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved by motion.
2.CONFLICTS OF INTEREST - No conflicts of interest were declared.
3. Confidential personal and legal matters were discussed.
4.RISE AND REPORT
A motion to rise and report was moved at 6:25 p.m.and carried.
2008 Mav13...20
15.REPORTS OF COMMITTEES -cont'd
g.REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE - IN CAMERA -cont'd
RECOMMENDATIONS;
1.That the motions approved at the 2008 May 13 in-camera meeting related to a resignation
to retirement,a staffing referral to the Budget process and negotiation guiding principles be
approved.
' 2. ThattheThames Valley District School Board enter into a three-yearcontractwith Compass
Group Canada for the period of 2008 July 15 to 2011 July 14 with two,two-year renewal
options to provide cafeteria food services in the secondary schools and at the Education
Centre.
J.STEWART,
Chairperson
Recommendations 1 and 2 were adopted on motion of J.Stewart,seconded by J.Bennett.
16.COMMUNICATIONS
a.ONTARIO PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARDS'ASSOCIATION -UPDATE -none
b.ALLIANCE OF CANADIAN CINEMA,TELEVISION AND RADIO ARTISTS (ACTRA)
The ACTRAletter was deferred to t^e Board meeting of 2008 May27.
c.TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH-WEST OXFORD DRAFT RESOLUTION
A draft resolution was received from the Township of South-West Oxford to the Minister of
Education related to use of school facilities in the township.Chair Sattler advised that she will
be responding to the Township of South-West Oxford. A half-day forum to be held In late fallwith
all area municipalities to discuss expanding partnerships,etc.is being considered.
17.NOTICE OF MOTION -none
18.MOTION -NOTICE OF WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN none
19.ADDITIONAL ITEMS
20.QUESTIONS/COMMENTS BY MEMBERS
21.ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 11:38 p.m-.on motion of R.Tisdale,seconded by T..Grant.
CONFIRMED:
Chairperson
2008 Mav13...21
SUMMARY OF APPROVED RECOMMENDATIONS OF 2008 MAY 13
That the issue of establishing a design committee regarding renovations to Glendale High School be
deferred until legal advice has been sought from the Board's solicitor for discussion at the 2008 May
27 Board meeting,if possible.
That Recommendations 1,2,3,4,and 5 of the Senior Administrative response to the Middlesex 1
ARC be deferred to the 2008 September 23 Board meeting for consideration.
That the Middlesex 1 Accommodation Review Committee be disbanded.
That agenda items 14.e.,15.d.,and 16.b.be deferred to the 2008 May 27 Board meeting for
consideration.
That the Annual Report of the Environmental Advisory Committee of 2008 May 13 be referred to the
Budget Advisory Committee for consideration of the requests for additional funding.
That the 2008 April 22 report of the Policy Working Committee be deferred to the 2008 May 27 Board
meeting for consideration and that copies of the Procedures for Supervision of Teaching Staff be
provided to all trustees other than members of the Policy Working Committee.
That since there are adequate funds,the requests submitted for funds for Professional Development
opportunities after 2008 April 01 be approved.
That the motions approved at the 2008 May 13 in-camera meeting related to a resignation to
retirement,a staffing referral to the Budget process and negotiation guiding principles be approved.
That the Thames Valley District School Board enter Into a three-year contract w/ith Compass Group
Canada for the period of 2008 July 15 to 2011 July 14 w/ith two,two-year renewal options to provide
cafeteria food services in the secondary schools and at the Education Centre.