2/25/2014 - Regular Board Meetingf THAMES VALLEY DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
REGULAR BOARD MEETING,PUBLIC SESSION
2014 FEBRUARY 25,7:00 P.M.
BOARD ROOM,EDUCATION CENTRE
AGENDA
V-verbal
M -material
1.CALL TO ORDER V
2.O CANADA V
3.SPECIAL MUSICAL PRESENTATION -Lord Roberts French Immersion
Public School Chamber Choir
4.APPROVAL OF AGENDA V
5.OFFICIAL RECORD
6.RECOGNITIONS -none
(_7.CONFLICTS OF INTEREST V
8.CHAIR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS V
9.DIRECTOR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS V
10.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
a.Board Improvement Plan for Student Achievement 2013-14 M
11.MINUTES OF THE 2014 FEBRUARY 11 BOARD MEETING M
a.Confirmation of Minutes
b.Business Arising from Minutes
12.STUDENT TRUSTEES'UPDATE V
13.REPORTS FROM THE ADMINISTRATION -none
14.REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES
a. TVDSB-Cityof London Liaison Committee,2013 October 30 M
b.Special Education Advisory Committee,2014 February 4 M
c.Chairs'Committee,2014 February 18 M
d.Committee of the Whole-In Camera,2014 February 25 V
15.COMMUNICATIONS
a.Ontario Public School Boards'Association (OPSBA)-Update V
16.NOTICE OF MOTION -none
17.MOTION -NOTICE OF WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN
18.ADDITIONAL ITEMS
19.QUESTIONS/COMMENTS BY MEMBERS
20.ADJOURNMENT
THAMES VALLEY DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
2014 FEBRUARY 25,6:55 P.M.
BOARD ROOM,EDUCATION CENTRE
The Board met inregular session on 2014 February 25 inthe Board Room at the Education Centre,
meeting In public session at 6:55 p.m.The following were in attendance:
TRUSTEES
R.Tisdale (Chair)
J.Bennett
R.Campbell
D.Clark
T.Grant
Regrets:J.Coghlin,
G.Hart,P.Jaffe
W.Huff
D.Idibe
B.McKinnon
8.Polhill
J.Todd
C.Tully
ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS
K.Dalton
J.Pratt
C.Bourbonnais-
MacDonald
R.Culhane
M.Deman
K.Edgar
L Griffith-Jones
D.MacPherson
M.Moynlhan
V.Nielsen
8.Powell
B.Sonier
K.Wilkinson
K.Bushell
B.Williams
K.Young
K.Aitken
8.Killip (-8:00)
F. Galizia (-8:00)
P.Venesoen (-8:00)
1.CALL TO ORDER
Board Chair R.Tisdale called the meeting to order at 6:55 p.m.
2./3.O CANADA AND SPECIAL MUSICAL PRESENTATION
The appreciation of the Board was extended Lord Roberts French Immersion Public School Chamber
Choir for their performance and to Conductor Susan Whitehead for leading in the singing of O
Canada and performing three musical selections.
4.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved on motion of D.Clarke,seconded by R.Campbell.
5.OFFICIAL RECORD -none
6.RECOGNITIONS -none
7.CONFLICTS OF INTEREST -none declared
8.CHAIR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS-none
9.DIRECTOR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS-none
10.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
a.Board improvement Plan for Student Achievement 2013-14
Supts.M.Deman and D.MacPherson and Manager P.Venesoen of Research and Assessment
presented the Board Improvement Plan for Student Achievement (BIP8A)2013-14 (AppendixA)
for discussion.
2014 February 25...2
10.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS -cont'd
a.Board Improvement Plan for Student Achievement 2013-14 -cont'd
The development of the Board Improvement Plan from the TVDSB Strategic Plan and the
foundatlonal principles to the interactive tool for school improvement teams was outlined.
The following four categories were discussed:
•Learning and Achievement;
•Engagement and Well-being;
•Culture for Learning;and
«Instructional Leadership.
The philosophical change from a top down approach to school improvement to a student-needs
driven approach was recognized and applauded.
The following questions of clarification were noted:
•Research and Assessment will require a few years of data collection to confirm influences for
system improvements.
•Superintendents willwork with their Community of Schools to share strategies for using the
BIPSA and individual road maps.
'•Superintendents will work together as a whole group with all Community of Schools on an
ongoing basis throughout the year.
•The BIPSA includes parent input through school council meetings (i.e.TVPIC/Home and
School Associations,etc.)as part of the holistic approach to gathering data.
The influence of the First Nations Metis Inuit Medicine Wheel on the development of the BIPSA
framework was noted.
11.MINUTES OF THE 2014 FEBRUARY 11 BOARD MEETING
a.Confirmation of Minutes
The minutes of the Regular Board Meeting of 2014 February 11 was adopted on motion of
D.Clark,seconded by R.Campbell.
b.Business Arising from the Minutes -none
12.STUDENT TRUSTEES'UPDATE
Student Trustee C. Tully advised that the student election process is underway.Applications are due
2014 March 26.Student Trustee D.Idibe added that elections will take place in April.
13.REPORTS FROM THE ADMINISTRATION -none
14.REPORTS OF COMMITTEES
a.Report of the TVDSB-Clty of London Liaison Committee,2013 October 30
Trustee Bennett referred to the written report of the 2013 October 30 TVDSB-City of London
Liaison Committee meeting as attached (Item A)and provided to Trustees in advance of the
Board meeting.
b.Report of the Special Education Advisory Committee,2014 February 4
Trustee Bennett referred to the written report of the 2014 February 4 Special Education Advisory
Committee meeting as attached (Item B)and provided to Trustees in advance of the Board
meeting.
2014 February 25...3
14.REPORTS OF COMMITTEES -cont'd
c.Report of the Chairs'Committee,2014 February 18
Trustee Grant referred to the written report of the 2014 February 18 Chairs'Committee meeting
as attached (item C) and providedto Trustees in advance ofthe Board meeting.
d.Report of the Committee of the Whole in-Camera,2014 February 25
Trustee Grant reported that the committee met in camera from5:35 p.m. to 5:43 p.m. The
committee discussed confidential personal matters.There were no recommendations.
15.COMMUNICATiONS
a.ONTARiO PUBLiC SCHOOL BOARDS'ASSOCiATiON (OPSBA)UPDATE
Trustee Grant advised that she and Chair Tisdale will be attending the OPSBA Board of Directors
meeting on February 28 and March 1.Acopy of the Agenda is available for Trustees review.
16.NOTiCE OF MOTiON -none
17.MOTION -NOTICE OF WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN -none
18.ADDITIONAL ITEMS -none
19.QUESTIONS/COMMENTS BY MEMBERS -none
20.ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. on motion of Wl.Reld,seconded by J.Todd.
Confirmed:
Chairperson
Higher order/critical
thinking
Problem solving
High expectations
Connections and
applications
Creativity,innovation.
and technology
Board Improvement Plan for
.Student Achievement 2013-2014
Inquiry learrjing V/Maximize learning
All students believe they
can learn
Equity and inclusion
Safe schools
Caring,responsible citizens
Caring adult
Collaborative approaches
Environmental-responsibility
opportunities and
improve achievement
for each student
Cultivate the
conditions that
iead to an
enhanced culture
We build
each
student^s
tomorrow.
every day.
12/16/2013
Support and build
instructional
leadership
capacity
Appendix A
Assessment for, as,and of
learning
Differentiated instruction
and assessment
Learning goals and success
criteria
Authentic real M/orW
problems
Collaborative teaching and
learning
•\
i
V -
Learning and Achievement
Use inquiry skills to
investigate,reflect,and
think deeply about
situations,problems,
interpretations,and
solutions
Demonstrate originality.
inventiveness,and
creativity by utilizing
technology and other
innovative formats and
media
Regularly use higher-order
thinking skills
GOAL:
Maximize learning
opportunities and
improve achievement
for each student
Make connections
between what they have
learned,what they are
learning and why,and how
it connects to their lives
Use problem solving
strategies to solve diverse
problems across all subject
areas and in their everyday
Develop a positive learning
stance;confident in their
abilities,motivated to
succeed,and resilient
w/hen faced with learning
challenges
Engagement and Weil-Being
Students will...
Set goals and make
ihforrned decisions about
pathways,optionsj
prograrns,and career
choices based on their
interests
Demonstrate an
understanding of the
impact of mental health
and v/ellness on academic
Demonstrate an
understanding of the
aspects and importance of
healthy living and healthy
relationships
GOAL:
Representtheir owri voice
and respect the vpice of
othersSupportandpromote
the engagement and
well-being of all
students
Build,strong peer,school
and community
relationships
Instructional Leadership
Students will..
Engage in learning designed
and developed collaboratively
by educators based on
evidence and curriculum
expectations
Use assessment data to
independently refine their
work,plan next steps,
monitor their own
progress,and advocate for
their learning needs
GOAL:
Support and build
Make choices based on
their readiness,interests,
and learning preferences
instructional leadership
Explore real-world issues
and solve authentic
problems
capacity
Be able to describe what they
are learning and articulate the
learning goals and success
criteria
Students will
ulture For Learning
Develop an optimistic
outlook toward learning by
believing their effort,
perseverance,and hard
work leads to success
contribute to problem solving in
respectful,responsible ways
See themselves
contributing as citizens in
developing a caring,
respectful,and inclusive
learning environment and
community
The System will assume responsibility and provide resources to:
Maximize learning opportunities and improve achievement
for each student
The development of instructional strategies that are
planned,purposeful,explicit,and innovative
Instruction that incorporates the development of higher
order thinking,metacognitive skills,and inquiry learning
skills
Comprehensive literacy and numeracy programs that
emphasize problem solving
Instruction that provides authentic connections across
subjects and grades
The identification and development of learning resources
and materials that are current,culturally relevant,and
inclusive
Cultivate the conditions that lead to an enhanced culture for
learning
The alignment of initiatives that reinforce positive school
climates to enhance students'desire to learn
Safe,inclusive, and accepting learning environments
Programs that enable teachers to create learning
environments that accurately reflect their diverse
community
A culture that is representative of character education and
invested in cultivating positive relationships
•Opportunities for staff and students to participate in
progi^ams that reinforce environmental responsibility
OlilTTo
OJelrTS
affe.ctistiliaent
Support and build instructional leadership capacity
Building and maintaining a culture of collective responsibility
for high levels of student achievement and v/ell-being
Capacity building for the continuous improvement and
implementation of effective teaching and learning practices
Collaborative instructional leadership where school leaders
actively co-learn with staff
Opportunities for shared learning within and across schools
Alignment of assessment,evaluation,and reporting policies,
processes,and practices
Differentiated professional learning opportunities
Item A
REPORT OF THE TVDSB-CITY OF LONDON LIAISON COMMITTEE (LIAISON COMMITTEE)
MEMBERS PRESENT
J.Bennett (Chair)
P.Jaffe
R.Tisdale
J.Fontana
D.Henderson
B.Polhlll
Regrets:T.Grant,N.Branscombe
2013 October 30
1:08 p.m.-2:50 p.m.
ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS
L.Elliott
K.Dalton
J.Pratt
B.Williams
C.Saunders
A.Zuldema
G.Hopcroft
L.Livingstone
The official report of the Committee Is duly recorded by the City Clerk of the City of London (Appendix
LC-1).
This report is prepared by the Supervisor,Corporate Services of the Thames Valley District School Board.
1.CONFLICTS OF INTEREST -none
2.APPROVAL OF THE REPORT
The following motion was moved and carried:
That the 1 report of the City of London and Thames Valley District School Board Liaison
Committee be received.
3.ACCOMMODATION REVIEW COMMITTEE (ARC)PROCESS
Chair J.Bennett introduced and asked Associate Director K.Dalton to provide an overview of the
ARC process.Associate Director Dalton noted the ARC process was initiated under Ministry
guidelines to provide Trustees with an avenue to receive public Input when a school Is being
considered for closure.Public Input to Trustees from the ARC Is provided through a report that
comes to the Board.Before the ARC presents a report to the Board,Administration presents their
report.This is to ensure transparency.It was noted that Trustees take both the Administration
and the ARC report Into consideration during their deliberations.Associate Director Dalton
reviewed the membership of the ARC and noted that the ARC needs to consider the programming
needs for all students.
Associate Director Dalton described the 3 year cycle of a school review.She noted that even
before an ARC is considered,administration fully gathers and reviews data.This is done each
summer In preparation of the Annual Pupil Accommodation Report that goes before the Board in
November.This report may or may not recommend an ARC.If recommended and approved by the
Board,an ARC starts late winter or spring and is a one year process.Any school closure that Is
approved by the Board requires a minimum of one year notice.There are no new ARCs
recommended at this time.
Associate Director Dalton summarized noting the ARC process follows a set of operating
guidelines set by the Ministry, is based on the principal of effective programming for all students,
and Is based on a solid rational backed up through data and research.
4.CENTRAL LONDON ARC UPDATE
Associate Director Dalton reviewed the timeline for the Central London ARC noting the Board of
Trustees is making their decision at the 2013 November 26 public board meeting.
Discussion ensued in regards to the number of students currentlyattending LomeAvenue and
projections.Associate Director Dalton shared information inregards to the idealnumber of
students that ensure optimal programming and instruction.
Further discussion explored the use of unused space at LomeAvenue and the potentialfora family
Centre funded bythe Cityof London;they confinned that operating dollars have been budgeted
and that capital dollars whilenot confirmed are anticipated to be approved inthe next budget.
These dollars v/ould meet their own spacing needs.It was acknowledged that a community
organization cun'ently is working on a business case to lease space and their involvement was
essential as the involvement of the City of London alone would not be sufficient.
The following motion was moved and carried:
That Administration of the TVDSB be requested to coordinate a meeting with the Cityof
London and the London Intercommunity Health Centre prior to the 2013 November 26
Board meeting of TVDSB to discuss potential business plans for the future use of Lome
Avenue Public School.
5.SHERWOOD FOREST PROPERTY UPDATE
Chair Bennett introduced and asked Associate Director J.Pratt to provide an update in regards to
the Sherwood Forest Property.Associate Director Pratt briefly reviewed regulation 444(98)noting
the property Is available by proposal to preferred entities for 90 days.It expires 2013 December
22.After 2013 December 22 the property vi/ill be available to the open market and willfollow a
sealed bid process.
As a follow up to the last meeting it was noted a letter on behalf of the City advocating for changes
to the regulations was not requested by TVDSB at this time.
6.FUTURE ARCS
Chair Bennett commented as per the discussion in Item 3.0 there are no new ARCs recommended
for 2014-2015.
7.FRENCH IMMERSION ACCOMMODATION REPORT-FOLLOW UP TO THE 2013 OCTOBER 2
MEETING
Chair Bennett acknowledged and thanked the Mayor and Councillors for their participation at the
2013 October 2 meeting along with many of their counterparts from municipalities in the Thames
Valley.
As a followup to the meeting, Chair Bennett offered to answer any outstanding questions.
Councillor D.Henderson asked to receive the power point presentation;Supervisor B.Williams will
fonvard the presentation to City Clerk C.Saunders for distribution.
In response to a question,Associate Director Daiton noted busing would be affected at three sites,
with little impact on two of the sites.The greatest Impact may be at West Oaks where the number
of buses will Increase from 4 to 5 to about 8 or 9.
The City offered to provide assistance;it was suggested signage for street parking may need to
change at the schools.
Chair Bennett shared that public input is being received at a special meeting of the Board,2013
December 3.
The following motion was moved and carried:
That the verbal updates and presentations be received.
8.ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
In response to a community concern from a faith-based group,TVpSB administration clarified that
groups may use the school outside of Instructional hours.
Discussion ensued In regards to exploring joint community projects.
The following motion was moved and carried:
That Administration from the Thames Valley District School Board and the City of London
explore areas of collaboration and cost sharing on safety-related matters,such as the
lighting by Lord Nelson Public School,and report back to the Liaison Committee.
Director L Elliott shared the significant work she has been doing in regards to attracting
International students.Mayor J.Fontana expressed his desire to establish a sub-committee to
explore this further.
The following motion was moved and carried:
That Administration from the Thames Valley District School Board and the City of London
explore opportunities to promote and attract international students to the City of London
and report back to the Liaison Committee.
9.NEXT MEETING
City Clerk Saunders will send an emailto committee members to set a next meeting date in
January or February 2014.
10.ADJOURNMENT
A motion to adjourn was moved and carried at 2:50 p.m.
RECOMMENDATIONS:none
Joyce Bennett
Chairperson
Appendix LC-1
2ND REPORT OF THE
CITY OF LONDON AND THAMES VALLEY DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD LIAISON COMMITTEE
Meeting held on Wednesday,October 30, 2013, commencing at 12:08 PM in Committee Room
#4. London City Hall,300 Dufferin Avenue,London, Ontario, N6A4L9.
PRESENT:Chair J.Bennett,Trustees P.Jaffe and R.Tisdale,Mayor J.F.Fontana,Councillors
B.Polhill and D.Henderson and C.Saunders (Secretary).
ABSENT:Trustee T.Grant and Councillor N.Branscombe.
ALSO PRESENT:K.Dalton,L. Elliott, G.Hopcroft,L.Livingstone,J.Pratt,B. Williams, A.
Zuidema.
1.Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest
None were disclosed.
2.City Clerk -1st Report of the Citv of London and Thames Vallev District School Board
Liaison Committee
POLHILL AND TISDALE
That the 1st Report of the City of London and Thames Valley District School Board Liaison
Committee,from its meeting held on June 24,2013 BE RECEIVED.CARRIED
3.Accommodation Review Committee Process
FONTANA AND JAFFE
That the verbal presentation of K.Dalton,Thames Valley District School Board,providing
an overview of the Accommodation Review Committee process BE RECEIVED.
CARRIED
4.Central London Accommodation Review Committee Update -Lome Avenue Public
School
POLHILL AND JAFFE
That the following actions be taken regarding the update on the Central London
Accommodation Review Committee process pertaining to Lome Avenue Public School:
a)the verbal update provided by K.Dalton,Thames Valley District School Board
(TVDSB), BE RECEIVED;and,
b)the Administration of the TVDSB BE REQUESTED to co-ordinate a meeting with
the City of London and the London Intercommunity Health Centre (LIHC),prior to
the November 26,2013 meeting of the TVDSB,to discuss potential concepts and
business plans for the future use of Lome Avenue Public School;it being noted
that the TVDSB will be considering the future of Lome Avenue Public School at its
meeting to be held on November 26,2013.CARRIED
5.Sherwood Forest Public School Update
TISDALE AND POLHILL
That the verbal update from J.Pratt,Thames Valley District School Board (TVDSB), with
respect to the Sherwood Forest Public School disposal of property process BE
RECEIVED;it being noted that the TVDSB Administration will investigate if discussions
can be held,during the 90-day review period,regarding fair market value for the property.
CARRIED
6.Future Accommodation Review Committees
TISDALE AND POLHILL
That the verbal update from K.Dalton,Thames Valley District School Board,regarding
future Accommodation Review Committees BE RECEIVED;it being noted that K.Dalton
advised that there are no future Accommodation Review Committees contemplated at this
time.CARRIED
7.French Immersion Accommodation Report
TISDALE AND POLHILL
That the verbal presentation from K.Dalton,Thames Valley District School Board,
providing an overview of the French Immersion Accommodation Report BE RECEIVED.
CARRIED
8.Additional Business -Lord Nelson Public School
FONTANA AND JAFFE
That the Administrations of the Thames Valley District School Board and the City of
London BE REQUESTED to discuss potential areas of collaboration and cost sharing on
safety-related matters,such as the lighting by Lord Nelson Public School,and report back
to the Committee on the results of those discussions.CARRIED
9.Additional Business -International Students
FONTANA AND TILSDALE
That the Administrations of the Thames Valley District School Board and the City of
London BE REQUESTED to discuss opportunities to jointly promote and attract
international students to the City of London and report back to the Liaison Committee
regarding this matter.CARRIED
10.Next Meeting
That the next meeting of the City of London and Thames Valley District School Board Liaison
Committee will be held in late January 2014 or early February 2014,with the specific date
to be determined at a future date.
11.Adjournment
FONTANA AND JAFFE
That the meeting of the Cityof London and Thames Valley DistrictSchool Board Liaison
Committee adjourn.CARRIED
The meeting adjourns at 2:50 PM.
J.Bennett,Chair
C.Saunders,Secretary
Appendix AC-1
2ND REPORT OF THE
CITY OF LONDON AND THAMES VALLEY DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD LIAISON COMMITTEE
Meeting held on Wednesday,October 30,2013,commencing at 12:08 PM in Committee Room
#4, London City Hall,300 Dufferin Avenue,London, Ontario,N6A4L9.
PRESENT:Chair J.Bennett,Trustees P.Jaffe and R.Tisdale,Mayor J.F.Fontana,Councillors
B.Polhiil and D.Henderson and C.Saunders (Secretary).
ABSENT;Trustee T.Grant and Councillor N.Branscombe.
ALSO PRESENT:K.Dalton,L. Elliott, G.Hopcroft,L.Livingstone,J.Pratt,B. Williams, A.
Zuidema.
1.Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest
None were disclosed.
2.Citv Clerk -1st Report of the City of London and Thames Valley District School Board
Liaison Committee
POLHILL AND TISDALE
That the 1st Report of the City of London and Thames Valley District School Board
Liaison Committee,from its meeting held on June 24,2013 BE RECEIVED. CARRIED
3.Accommodation Review Committee Process
FONTANA AND JAFFE
That the verbal presentation of K.Dalton,Thames Valley District School Board,
providing an overview of the Accommodation Review Committee process BE
RECEIVED.CARRIED
4.Central London Accommodation Review Committee Update -Lome Avenue Public
School
POLHILL AND JAFFE
That the following actions be taken regarding the update on the Central London
Accommodation Review Committee process pertaining to Lome Avenue Public School:
a)the verbal update provided by K.Dalton,Thames Valley District School Board
(TVDSB), BE RECEIVED;and.
b)the Administration ofthe TVDSB BE REQUESTED to co-ordinate a meeting with
the City of London and the London intercommunity Health Centre (LIHC),prior
to the November 26, 2013 meeting of the TVDSB, to discuss potential concepts
and business plans for the future use of Lome Avenue Public School; it being
noted that the TVDSB will be considering the future of Lome Avenue Public
School at Itsmeeting to be held on November 26,2013.CARRIED
5.Sherwood Forest Public School Update
TISDALE AND POLHILL
That the verbal update from J. Pratt,Thames Valley District School Board (TVDSB),with
respect to the Sherwood Forest Public School disposal of property process BE
RECEIVED;it being noted that the TVDSB Administration will investigate if discussions
can be held,during the 90-day review period,regarding fair maricet value for the
property.CARRIED
6.Future Accommodation Review Committees
TISDALE AND POLHILL
That the verbal update from K.Dalton,Thames Valley District School Board, regarding
future Accommodation Review Committees BE RECEIVED; it being noted that K. Dalton
advised that there are no future Accommodation Review Committees contemplated at
this time.CARRIED
7.French Immersion Accommodation Report
TISDALE AND POLHILL
That the verbal presentation from K.Dalton,Thames Valley District School Board,
providing an overview of the French Immersion Accommodation Report BE RECEIVED.
CARRIED
8.Additional Business -Lord Nelson Public School
FONTANA AND JAFFE
That the Administrations of the Thames Valley District School Board and the City of
London BE REQUESTED to discuss potential areas of collaboration and cost sharing on
safety-related matters, such as the lighting by Lord Nelson Public School, and report
back to the Committee on the results of those discussions.CARRIED
9.Additional Business -International Students
FONTANA AND TILSDALE
That the Administrations of the Thames Valley District School Board and the City of
London BE REQUESTED to discuss opportunities to jointly promote and attract
international students to the City of London and report back to the Liaison Committee
regarding this matter.CARRIED
10.Next Meeting
That the next meeting of the City of London and Thames Valley District School Board
Liaison Committee will be held In late January 2014 or early February 2014,with the
specific date to be determined at a future date.
11.Adlournment
FONTANA AND JAFFE
That the meeting of the City of London and Thames Valley District School Board Liaison
Committee adjourn.CARRIED
The meeting adjourns at 2:50 PM.
J.Bennett,Chair
C.Saunders,Secretary
Item B
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL EDUCATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
2014 February 4
12:18 p.m.-2:50 p.m.
MEMBERS ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS
Associationfor Bright Ctiildren,Dennis Ensing Superintendent ofSpecial Education,R. Culhane
Autism Ontario, B.Curry Secondary Vice-Principal,T. Birtch
Children's /^d Society of London and Middlesex,M.Cvetkovich Learning Supervisor, D.Willaert
Chippewas ofthe Thames,C. Dendias M.Chevalier, Elementary Principal
Easter Seals Society, A. Morse R. Lee, Elementary Prindpal
Epilepsy Support Centre, B. Harvey K.Aitken,Corporate Sen/ices
FASD E.L.M.O.,W.Confbrzi (-2:29)D.Clarke,Secondary Principal
Learning DisabilitiesAssociation of Ontario.T. Fawdry (-2:50) Coordinator School Counselling and Sodal Wcrtc Sen/ices,
Thames Valley Council of Home and School,A. Morell(+12:30) M.Ferdinand
Trustee J.Bennett School Psychologist,M.Gilpin
Trustee R.Campbell Manager S.Killip,Research and Assessment
Trustee T.Grant C.Stager,Research and Assessment
Voice for Hearing Impaired Children,M.Barbeau
Vanier Children's Services.B.Montminy (-2:45)
Regrets:
Community Living Education Committee,S. Wilson
Thames Valley Children's Centre,J. Gritzan
1.CALL TO ORDER
Supt.R.Culhane called the meeting to order at 12:18 p.m. in the London Room at the Education
Centre.
2.CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved on motion and carried.
3.CONFLICTS OF INTEREST-none
4.ELECTION OF AGENCY CHAIR AND TRUSTEE VICE-CHAIR
Supt.R.Culhane presided over the election of Chair and Vice-Chair for 2014.This year the Chair of
SEAC will be an agency representative and the Vice-Chair will be a Trustee.
Nominations were collected for the Chair.Nominees were asked if willing to stand.As a result of the
process,Alison Morse was elected as Chair by acclamation.
Nominations were collected for the Vice-Chair.Nominees were asked ifwilling to stand.As a result of
the process,Joyce Bennett was elected as Vice-Chair by acclamation.
All ballots were destroyed.
5.MINUTES OF THE MEETING FROM 2013 DECEMBER 3
The minutes were approved as printed.
6.BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES OF 2013 SEPTEMBER 10
The crisis in Developmental Services was discussed.Reference to stories shared by families across
the province regarding adults with disabilities and the lack of support available was noted.This
includes the transition process from secondary school into the workforce.It was suggested that
TVDSB continue to work on a more collaborative process to address the issue.
In response to a question regarding the Special Education:Revenue &Expense Schedule -
Expenses Restricted Grant (Furniture and Equipment - SEA Per Pupil) it was confirmed that the
funds were used to purchase 69 computer/laptops,247 IPads,3 Smart Boards and 12 Kurzwell
software licenses.
7.EQAO SPECIAL EDUCATION TRENDS FOLLOW-UP DISCUSSION FROM DECEMBER
PRESENTATION
Manager S.Killip and C.Stager of Research and Assessment joined the meeting to discuss further
EQAO Special Education Trends (Item A).They highlighted the updates including the Distribution of
EQAO Grade 6 Scores for 2013:Students Identified as Gifted.Questions of clarification were noted.
It was agreed that Research and Assessment will provide further updates to follow the trends
regarding Special Education Data Grade 9 & 10.The Early Assessment Feedback pilot project with
Western University also will come forward for discussion in the late fall 2014.
8.MENTAL HEALTH STRATEGY
Coordinator School Counselling and Social Work Services,M.Ferdinand and School Psychologist M.
Gilpinjoined the meeting to facilitate a discussion on the Mental Health Strategy Plan:Understand
Me (Item B).The presentation highlighted the vision that "Every school in Thames Valley District
School Board will be a mentally healthy school".The key change included using the word
"promotion"as opposed to "prevention".
Two student videos promoting mental health and wellness were viewed and discussed.A feedback
form was distributed.It was agreed that parent involvement is key and that parents continue to be
actively Involvedin their child's education,health and well-being.
Reference material is available on the Ministry of Education website at:
http://www.edu.aov.on.ca/enQ/document/reports/SuPDortinQMInds.Ddf
It also was agreed that the Developmental Education Teacher on Special Assignment Initiative
(presented September 2013)bring an update on the progress to a future meeting.
Chair Morse officially welcomed Diane Willaert on behalf of the committee to the role of Learning
Supervisor responsible for Special Education.
9.CORRESPONDENCE
The following correspondence was reviewed:
•Near North District School Board regarding the funding model for special education.
• Toronto Catholic District School Board regarding the state of speech and language services for
school-aged children in Ontario.
It was noted that Easter Seals Ontario has a very deep concern for the state of speech and
language services for school-aged children and the waitlistfor services through the Community
Care Access Centre.
•London District Catholic School Board regarding the funding model for special education.
10.NEW BUSINESS
It was suggested that the Board look at a broader range of agencies to inviteto apply to sit on SEAC.
In addition, it was agreed that the SEAC Handbook available to the public be reviewed and updated
as part of the annual Special Education Plan review.
Discussion ensued regarding the working groups and status.Further discussion will take place at the
next meeting.
11.FORUM:ASSOCIATION UPDATES
FASD ELMO - It was noted that the recent presentation to Developmental Services went well and
Information was shared throughout the province to Increase awareness on current Issues.
TVPIC - Information on the Ontario Healthy Schools Coalition will be distributed by email.
The Learning Disabilities Association of Ontario -Parent Advocacy Training Series will begin on
February 27 and run until the end of April.A satellite office will open In Woodstock and will offer a
Skillsfor Learning program beginning April 16 to June 4 for Grades 3-8.
Trustees J.Bennett and T. Grant advised that they will attend the upcoming Education Symposium
that will include information on the use of technology In the classroom.They also advised members
that the 2014 Summit on Children and Youth Mental 1-Iealth will take place on April 3 &4.
Trustee R. Campbell advised that the Mental Health Conference put together by the Accessibility
Committee of London was cancelled due to a lack of registrants/participants.
Chair Morse expressed her concern for the lack of communication from the Minister's Advisory
Council on Special Education.Recent highlights allude to a number of Initiatives;however,no solid
information has been provided.
12.FUTURE MEETING DATES
Tuesday,March 04,2014 11:45 am-03:00 pm
Monday,April 07,2014 06:30 pm-09:00 pm
Monday,May 05,2014 06:30 pm-09:00 pm
Tuesday,June 03,2014 11:45 am-03:00 pm
Monday,June 23,2014 06:30 pm-09:00 pm
13.FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
lEP Report Summary (Annually)
Alternative Education Update (Fall 2014 - K.Wilkinson)
Integrated Transition Planning for Young People with Developmental Disabilities
Parent Reaching Out Grant Request/Barriers to Engaging Families (March)-working group?
TVPIC Presentation (A. Morell)
Suicide Risk Management Protocols
Eariy Years Multidlsclpllnary
Suspension/Expulsion Data
Special Education Data Grade 9 & 10 (Fall 2014 - S.KIlip &C.Stager)
Eariy Assessment Feedback (Late Fall 2014/2015 - S.Kilip & C.Stager)
AODA
Developmental Education Teacher on Special Assignment initiative Update (D. Wlllaert)
14.ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 2:50 p.m. by motion.
RECOMMENDATIONS:NONE
ALISON MORSE
CHAIRPERSON
Students with Specia
Education Needs:
An Uodate
Prepared by:
Christine Stager and Steve Killip
Research &Assessment Services
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services,December 2013.Updated February 2014
Item A
ukty
V.
Demographics of our Students with
Special Education Needs
How nnany students have Individual Education Plans
EPS)?
How many students on lEPs have their needs
formally identified through an Identification,
Placement,and Review Committee (IPRC)?
What are their exceptionalities as identified through
an Identification,Placement,and Review
Committee (IPRC)?
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services,December 2013,Updated Febajary 2014
w.
Participation and Aclnievement of our
Students with SDecial Education Needs
WIno are the Grade 6 Students with Specia
Education needs that are writing EQAO?
What does their achievement lool<lilce?
Who are the Grade 6 Students with Specia
Education needs that are NOT writing EQAO?
prepared by Research &Assessment Services.December 2013,Updated February 2014
Demographics of our
Students with Specia
Education Needs
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services.December 2013.Updated February 2014
Students with Special Education Needs !^|
No involvement
lEP Only -students who have on lEP but ore without an
identified exceptionality
IPRC -students who have an lEP and have an
exceptionality that has been identified through the
Identification,Placement,and Review Committee
PRC).
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services.December 2013,Updated February 2014
v.,'
80%H
1 I
Students with Special Education Needs THiLV^
JK SK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
hNoIEP BlEPOnly slPRC
10 11 12
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services,December 2013,Updated February 2014
Students with Special Education Needs:(PRCs
IMiiA(£)®e5S[M)a)ife
Autism 538 10
Behavioural 423 8
Blind and Low Vision 36 1
Deaf and Hard of Hearing 168 3
Developmental Disability 931 i!18 •.
Language Impairment 78 1
Learning Disability 2277 43
Mild Intellectual Disability (MID)690 13
Physical Disability T64 3
Speech Impairment 6 <1
Visually Impaired 2 <1
Total 5313
There are an additional 958 students identified for Giftedness.
prepared by Research &Assessment Services,December 2013,Updated February 2014
Physical Disability
Autism
Learning Disability
Blind and
Low Vision
Deaf and
Hard of
Hearing
Developmental Disability
Language Impairment
TVDSB IPRC Exceptionalities
Exceptionalities of Grade 6 Students m^jcS
TVDSB PROVINCE
Prevalence Prevalence
Autism 1/115 -1/102
Behaviour 1/101 •1/195
Developmental Disability 1/70 1/215 -
Language Impairment 1/574 1/145
Learning Disability 1/21.1/19
Mild Intellectual Disability (MID)1/81,^r/108
All Others*1/199 ^1/100
*Includes Deaf/Hard of Hearing,Blind or Low Vision,Multiple Exceptionalities,Physical Disability,and
Speech Impairment.
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services.December 2013,Updated February 2014
Exceptionalities of Grade 6 Students
-<::^3EaykiJ
TVDSB PROVINCE
#Prevalence #Prevalence
Autism 45 1/115.1289 i/102 •
Behaviour 51 1/1 or '^675 1/1'95^_:
Developmental Disability 74 1/70 612 17215 '
Language Impairment 9 1/574 910 1/145
Learning Disability 245 1/21 7021 1/19
Mild Intellectual Disability (MID)64 1/ai 1219 1/108 '
All Others*26 1/199 1313 1/100 ''
*Includes Deaf/Hard of Hearing,Blind or Low Vision,Multiple Exceptionalities,Physical Disability,and
Speech Impairment.
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services.December 2013.Updated February 2014
TVDSB Province
\I
Grade 6 IPRC Exceptionalities
B Autism £1 Behaviour a Developmental Disability a LanguageImpairment • Learning Disability • MildIntellectual Disability (MID)@All Others*
TVDSB Province
Behaviour
B Autism BBefiaviour c Developmental Disability B LanguageImpairment a LearningDisability SMild Intellectual Disability (MID)b All Others*
TVDSB 'rovince
Developmental Disability
BAutIsm SBehavIour esDevelopmental Disability y Language Impairment •Learning Disability s Mild Intellectual Disability (MID)QAilOthers*
VDSB Province
^'V'-t':v'-i'.""y'f*^'•
Language Impairment
B Autism B Behaviour Q Developmental Disability a LanguageImpairment a LearningDisability • Mild inteiiectual Disability (MID)•All Others*
VDSB Province
Other areas
B Autism y Behaviour a Developmental Disability a language Impairment b Learning Disability b Mild Intellectual Disability (MID)s All Others*
6000
5000
4000
Cj 3000
2000
1000
0
EPS in Grade 12
Grade 12
24%of these
students are on lEPs
29%of these
students are on IEPS
Grade 12+
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services,December 2013,Updated February 2014
V y
BlEP
HNo lEP
EQAO Participation and Achievemen
of our Grade 6 Students witli Specia
Education Needs
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services,December 2013,Updated February 2014
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Exemptions and Achievement for ALL ^
Students witin Special Education Needs
Exemptions
Reading Writing Math
•2010-2011
50%
Aclnievement of
Provincial Standard
Reading Writing Math
a 2012-2013B2011-2012
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services.December 2013,Updated February 2014
Exemptions and Achievement for IPRC
Students
Exemptions
Reading Writing Math
a 2010-2011
Achievement of
Provincial Standard
Reading Writing Math
^2012-20132011-2012
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services,December 2013,Updated February 2014
Exemptions and Achievement for
Students with a LD
Exemptions
Reading Writing
a 2010-2011
Matin
15%-
Achievement of
Provincial Standard
Reading Writing Math
2011-2012 2012-2013
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services,December 2013,Updated February 2014
Exemptions by Exceptionality:READING
Behaviour Autism Mild Intellectual
Disability
VDSB •Province
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services.December 2013,Updated February 2014
Learning
Disability
V /
Change in Achievement of Provincia
Standard:2010/11 to 2012/13
Change in percentage of our students who achieve a Level 3 or a
Level 4 over the last three years.
EQAb
Redding EQAO Writing EQAOiAAath
All students with Special
Education Needs
+8 +6 +2
lEP Only-with
accommodations
+6 +3 -1
IPRC-with
accommodations
+5 +6 0
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services.December 2013,Updated February 2014
1^
"Gaps"in Acliievemen'
of Provinciai Standard:2012-2013
The chart below shows the difference between the percentage
of our students with Special Education Needs who achieve a
Level 3 or a Level 4 and the percentage of students in the
province with Special Education Needs who achieve a Level 3
or a Level 4.
in all cases the proportion of our students at Level 3 or Level 4
was below that of the province.
EQAO
Reading EQAO Writing EQAO Math
All students with Special
Education Needs
10 16 6
lEP Only-with
accommodations
8 16 4
1PRC-with
accommodations
2 11 5
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services,December 2013.Updated February 2014
y
w "Gaps"in Achievement of Provincia
Standard by Exceptionality:2012-2013
The chart below shows the difference between the percentage
of our students with a given exceptionality who achieve a Level
3 or a Level 4 and the percentage of students in the province
with the same given exceptionality who achieve a Level 3 or a
Level 4.
In all coses the proportion of our students at Level 3 or Level 4
was below that of the province.
Exceptionality EQAO
Reading EQAO Writing EQAO Math
Behaviour .13 10 11
Autism 8 10 2
Mild Intellectual Disability
(MID)6 12 0
Learning Disability 2 12 3
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services.December 2013,Updated February 2014
v.-
Students with a LD who have Achieved
Provincial Standard in Grade 6:Historical Data
Reading Writing Math
Prepared by Research &Assessment Sen/Ices,December 2013,Updated February 2014
Did not meet
Provincial Standard in
Grade 3
Met Provincial
Standard in Grade 3
Distribution of EQAO Grade 6 Scores for 2013:
Students Identified as Gifted
Reading
3.3 3.5 3.7 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.5
•Reading -
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services.December 2013,Updated February 2014
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
Distribution of EQAO Grade 6 Scores for 2013:
Students Identified as Gifted
Writing
I I
I I I I
I I I I I I
I I 1 I
2.5 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.5
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services.December 2013,Updated February 2014
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Distribution of EQAO Grade 6 Scores for 2013:
Students Identified as Gifted
Math
1 r
IJ
II
I I
2.5 1.7 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.5
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services.December 2013,Updated February 2014
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Distribution of EQAO Grade 6 Scores for 2013:
Students Identified as Gifted
T—i ®1^®I I n
2.5 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.5
•Reading •Writing "Math
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services.December 2013.Updated February 2014
Demographics of our Students with
Special Education Needs
Conclusions
We have identified the exceptionalities for 60%of Students with
Special Education Needs.
The largest proportion of students with identified exceptionalities are
identified for Learning Disabilities.
Our identification rate of several exceptionalities is markedly different
than the provincial Grade 6 average.These include:
-Behaviour
-Developmental Disabilities
-Language Impairments
Prepared by Research &Assessrmeni Services,December 2013,Updated February 2014
w
Participation and Achievement of our
Students with Special Education Needs
Conclusions
An increasing number of students witin Special Education needs ore
participating in Grade 6 EQAO and are achieving provincial
standards.
An increasing number of students who have identified
exceptionalities are participating in Grade 6 EQAO and ore
achieving provincial standards.
There is a gap between the achievement of TVDSB students and the
provincial achievement for students with identified Special
Education needs,but that gap appears to be narrowing,particularly
in the areas of reading and math.
Many students with Learning Disabilities who did not reach the
provincial standard in Grade 3 are performing at the Provincial
Standard in Grade 6.
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services,December 2013,Updated February 2014
Thank You!
Questions?
Prepared by Research &Assessment Services,December 2013,Updated February 2014
Mental Health Strategic Plan
Updates and Priorities
SEAC,Feb.4,2014
Presenters;Melanie Ferdinand,Michelle Gilpin
Mental Health Leadership
Team
Susan Dale
Carleen Dolmags
Karen Edgar
Melanie Ferdinand
Sarah Folino
IVIichelle Gilpin
Colin-King
David Pawson
Philippe Venesden
Ton'i Wilson
I."
Mental Health Lead:Michelle Gilpin
Mental Health Student Project Assistant:Ashna Gupta
Mental Health Teacher on Special Assignment:Michelle Brock
Every school in the Thames Valley
District School Board will be a
mentally healthy school.
Selective or targeted
intervention for students who
are vulnerable or at higher
risk (perhaps 15 - 20 %)'=!>
//-i?
intensive individualized
—ilntervention for students with
IDENTIFIED MH NEEDS
k (up to 5%with serious/chronic
ik Mental health needs
"siristfe:
CONCEPTUAL MODEL AS FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH SUPPORTS
PRIORITIZED STRATEGIC GOALS
Building Staff
Capacity
Creating Stigma-Free
Learning
Environments
Promoting Mental
Health and
Resiliency
m
K
Mental Health Literacy
Ministry Documents
Understanding impact on
responses to
Equity and inclusion
Celebration of Diversity
11bb11:hat-Vou{haves >fdoeI
poBsonSnBl^ind'all^rbLrt
-you h'aveste acr&ast:
nialce^ari'ofTiari.
nothziviniAs'^eflu?
n ';yp u !BI t-fom Ib ertce ^
I dan'lEtftlnk.kK's >^»iltet>y^ttiac you ihavn to talce
mcdte'atlon overy<dBy-^sc to,faal non-nal
•.Don*<c'.yoju<'worry'^tiviat'<te!5chi^ertns>'yoiu,-fronr)
who vourdBlfcyzire?
Wal >^>bed''dtovfa (i s)V
bo rn e Hi Inii;^ttiCK.
BUILDING STAFF CAPACITY
Professional Development
UWO Faculty of Education
Suicide risk staff training
Curriculum Support (Diversity,PHE)
Student Voice Resources
Menta Health Presentations
Fostering
Resiliency
Self-
Harming
Behaviours
Mentally
Healthy Staff
Childhood
Anxiety
BU LD NG STAFF CAPACITY
Impact of
Trauma on
Students
Suicide
Procedure and
Risk
Management
Talking to Students about
Suicide
Student Produced
Intended to 'Start the Conversation'
{link to Suicide video)
CREATING STIGMA FREE
starting Meaningful and Supportive
Conversations about Mental Health
Sharing a common language and understanding
Kid First Language
IVIoving BEYOND diagnoses
STIGMA FREE INITIATIVES
Youth Advisory Team
Clara's Big Ride (March 20,2014)
Mental Health Awareness Week
o (May 2014)
Parent Led Community Forums
7
Mental Health Promotion and
Tighter alignment with FNMI perspectives
Integration with Equity and Inclusion Portfolio
Integration with Safe Schools Initiatives
Early Years Multidisciplinary group
Focus on Universal Strategies
Promoting Mental Health and Wellness for All
Promoting Mental Health &
Wellness
Link to Student Video
One-Off Presentations
Limited Research Support
Well-intended but unaware of risks
Often No follow-up
Can increase (not decrease)stigma
May increase (not decrease)problematic
behaviours
How To Decide?
Clear idea of guest speaker's goals
How will vulnerable students be identified
and/or supported if necessary?
How will the intended innpact be evaluated?
School Wide Initiatives
RECOMMENDED:
Let's Talk Campaign -Clara's Big Ride
Student led in-class presentations
Evidence based awareness materials (e.g
TAMI -Talking About Mental Illness)
NOT RECOMMENDED:
Butterfly Project (self-harming)
Shock Value Displays (MAAD)
Movies/Books depicting suicide
Assemblies on suicide awareness
Key Resources
TVDSB Link to iVIH strategy
(TVDSB Home Page -Welcome-Services for Children&Youth-
Student Mental Health)
Supporting iVIinds (Focus on Promotion Strategies -green boxes)
V j
Bounce Back Resiliency Resource www.mentalhealthe4kids.ca
Suicide Response Policy
Community Partners
Things We Can Learn From a
Dog!!!
Never pass up the opportunity to go for a joyride
When it's in your best interest,practice obedience
Let others know when they have invaded your territory
Take naps and stretch before
Run,romp and play daily ^s,
Be loyal Iyv
•II •*
Learn some tricks i •'
/:k .
Never pretend to be something you're not
If what you want lies buried,dig until you find it
Delight in the simple joys of a long walk
Thrive on attention and let people touch you
On hot days,drink lots of water and lie under a shady
tree
If you make a mess,clean it up
Avoid biting when a simple growl will do
-a-
Item C
REPORT OF THE CHAIRS'COMMITTEE 2014 February 18
1:30 p.m.-3:25 p.m.
MEMBERS ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS
J.Bennett T. Grant (by phone)L.Elliott
G. Hart (by phone)R.Tisdale (Chair)B.Williams
C.Bourbonnals-MacDonald (+1:30,-2:00)
Trustee Non-Members:K.Bushell (+2:00,-2:25)
B.McKlnnon (+1:30,-2:00)S. Powell (+2:00,-2:25)
1.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda as amended was approved by motion.
2.CONFLICTS OF INTEREST -none declared.
3. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 25,2014 AND MARCH 04,2014 BOARD
AGENDAS/REVIEW OF SCHEDULED BOARD PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS
The in camera and publicBoard meeting agendas for 2014 February 25 and March04 were
discussed and amended.
4.CORRESPONDENCE -none
5.STRATEGIC PLANNING -none
6.ATTENDANCE AREA CONSULTATION
Supt.S. Powell and Exec.Officer K.Bushell joined the meeting to discuss the attendance area
consultation.
Exec.Officer K.Bushell summarized the recommendations administration intends to bring
forward to the Board of Trustees with respect to grand parenting.The recommendations are in
keeping with past practice.There was a suggestion to document the process for attendance
area consultations for future considerations.
7.MANDATORY BIAS FREE HIRING IN-SERVICE SESSIONS
Chair R.Tisdale reported there a number of Trustees unable to attend the daytime sessions set
for the mandatory bias free hiring training. It was noted that the training Is required for any
Trustee participating on hiring committees.Director Elliott and Chair Tisdale willtry to coordinate
an evening session.
8.IN CAMERA
On motion,the committee moved in camera at 1:34 p.m.to discuss personal matters,
reconvening in public session at 2:00 p.m.
On motion,the committee moved in camera at 2:05 p.m.to discuss property matters,
reconvening in public session at 2:08 p.m.
On motion,the committee moved in camera at 2:50 p.m.to discuss personal and legal matters,
reconvening in public session at 3:10 p.m.
9.PRESENTATIONS -none
10.OTHER BUSINESS
a.B.Davlson Boundary
Exec.Officer K.Bushell reportedthere isa need to clarify the attendance area for
B.Davlson.Trustees noted the understanding at the ARCwas forthe Thames/Ross
Boundary to remain thesame atthe newly configured school.This Information will be
communicated to principals.
Administration was reminded that there were a number of recommendations with respect to
Ross/Thames related to the transitioning of students to B. Davison.The Board expects an
update in the fall.
b.Students Care Canada
Chair Tisdale noted she will respond to the email sent to Trustees from Students Care
Canada explaining a similarfundisavailablethroughthe Foundation at TVDSB.
c.Middlesex Centre Municipal Membei^and Developers -Update
Chair R.Tisdale reported a letter of response has been drafted and will be sent.
11.DATE AND TIME OF NEXT MEETING
The next meeting is scheduled for 2014 March 18,12 p.m. in Governor Simcoe.
12.ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 3:25 p.m. by motion.
RECOMMENDATIONS:None
R.TISDALE
Committee Chair
1